Last quote by Ward McCarthy
Ward McCarthy quotes
Quite frankly, some of the stuff I don't understand. It doesn't help his credibility but it's going to take a while before we figure out his MO. You also haven't made a lot of money if you sold Donald Trump short. It's like when I was a hockey coach. I'm watching the other team warm up, trying to learn from that how they are … I think we can get the big picture by just looking at his appointees. Mostly CEOs. We are now USA LLC with Donald Trump as the CEO and chief negotiator.
Inflation is already on the way. We've seen inflation go from zero to 1.4 percent in 16 months.
We'll be looking at 2.5 percent in the third quarter. You're going to go above the Fed's target in 2017 by half a percentage point.
The new president elect and the congress have to execute on the stimulus proposals, and as that happens, it will start to have ripple effects on growth and inflation forecasts.
There's no mention of fiscal stimulus, so today's rate hike and the expectation for three next year – which is an increase of one hike – all reflects cumulative progress and expected progress against the dual mandate.
Average hourly earnings is disappointing. The drop in the unemployment rate – this is the best of the cycle. You had a huge drop in the level of unemployment and an increase in employment. They're saying things are improving.
It seems the bond market has settled in with rates, at least for the time being. The market is comfortable with it. The stock market still has stars in its eyes.
Frankly, you don't know what he's going to do. He's an unpredictable character, and politicians say a lot of things in elections that never come to fruition. The tone of his campaign initially was very negative with his focus on immigration and trade, and became more positive with the focus on infrastructure and tax cuts. Trump is coming in defining his legacy it. He literally wants to build it.
When you look at Trump's fiscal package – he's Reagan plus infrastructure spending. He's basically faster growth, bigger budget deficits and this probably will give us inflation.
It's good data, the fastest wage growth we've seen this entire cycle. The Fed should have gone this week ... they are well on their way to their objective, and this data is just the latest in a number of data releases that should compel them to get on with it.
It would have been bad for (Fed Chair) Janet Yellen if you had two consecutive meetings with three dissents. It looks like there was probably some kind of agreement on the language and he backed away.
I think they expect to go. I think they want to go, but they're still very skittish. We could see another employment pothole like we did in May, but I don't think that's going to happen. They may be concerned about the reaction to the election.
It could create a little volatility. The market is ho-hum ... so what if the Fed raises 25 basis points. What the market is more interested in is this mixed and muddled message that you're getting from all central banks that maybe they don't want the yield curve as flat as it is.
I think the market would react somewhat, but at the same time, prior history suggests even with that type of pledge, some skepticism is warranted.
There's no muscle in it ... expect for activity at drinking and eating establishments.
Consumers are over two-thirds of the economy. Relevant to next week, there's nothing here that would make the Fed raise rates.
The weakness in retail sales was scattered across a lot of things. It was driven mostly by motor vehicles but furniture sales were weak, building materials were weak.
My take on it is it's post Draghi redux. There's anxiety that the day will come when QE ends. That's why you had such a correlation between stocks and bonds. The reaction would be very different if it really was Fed anxiety.
Today's data supports the case for an increase in the fed funds rate in the foreseeable future as the labor market meanders toward full employment, but is not sufficiently compelling to support a rate hike on September 21.
All she said was the case for a rate hike has strengthened in recent months. The lack of specificity on a timetable looks like it's going to happen later rather than sooner.
It's just not going to happen in September, in my opinion. If anything else, the Fed does not want to throw itself in the crosshairs of this potentially ugly presidential campaign one week before the first debate.
It seems to me like it's still sufficiently noncommittal, that September does not look likely. I do think December is becoming more likely, but I also do not think they will make a commitment to that or start laying the groundwork until at least the November FOMC meeting. They've been burned by trying to set the stage too soon.